Don’t Tell Me What to Do, Tell Me Who to Follow! Field Experiment Evidence on Voluntary Donations

The authors conducted a field experiment in a protected area to explore the effects of conformity to a social reference versus a comparable, but imposed, suggested donation. By keeping the intrinsic valuation of the good constant, they were able to explore the effect of these two treatments on self image.

Treatment 1 (conformity to a social reference), saw a significant increase in people donating and an increase in the average conditional and sample donations as the reference increased. They also observed an inflection point, where the share of donations and the conditional donation were reduced as the reference increased beyond a certain level. Treatment 2 (donation amount suggested) showed more people donating, but had lower conditional donations. They concluded that people use their peers as a reference to conform to, but partially reject an imposed suggestion on how to behave.

EfD Authors

Dr. Francisco Alpízar Director and Senior Research Fellow
Professor Peter Martinsson Research Fellow

Keywords

Field experiments

Files

link to pdf 200.0 kB

Centers

central america

Type of publication

EfD Discussion paper

Reference

Francisco Alpízar and Peter Martinsson (2010) “Don’t Tell Me What to Do, Tell Me Who to Follow! Field Experiment Evidence on Voluntary Donations”, EfD Discussion Paper 10-16, Environment for Development Initiative and Resources for the Future, Washington DC, June 2010.

Comments

Publications

EfD Newsletter

Subscribe to our Newsletter service

Subscribe/Unsubscribe

Join or share

Join EfD on LinkedIn

Project info

Social norms and hypothetical bias in donations to national parks

The purpose of this paper, is to test the absolute as well the relative importance of anonymity, [cont...]

Environment for Development

Environment for Development