eeu sweden south africa | Behavior ec. Climate change
Climate Change in a Public Goods Game: Investment Decision in Mitigation versus Adaptation
The authors studied the potential tradeoff between countries’ investments in mitigation versus adaptation to climate change. Mitigating greenhouse gases may be a public good, but adaptation to climate change is a private good, benefiting only the country or individual.
They used a one-shot public-goods game with a stochastic term to account for probabilistic destruction, mapping the probability density function to within-group levels of mitigation, and compared low- and high-vulnerability treatments by varying the magnitude of disaster. Results showed no significant difference in mitigation level and emphasized the role of trust in enhancing cooperation.
EfD Authors
Sponsors
Keywords
Files
- Link to pdf 273.7 kB
Centers
- eeu sweden
- south africa
Type of publication
- EfD Discussion paper
Reference
Hasson, Reviva, Åsa Löfgren, and Martine Visser (2009), "Climate Change in a Public Goods Game: Investment Decision in Mitigation versus Adaptation", EfD Discussion Paper 09-23, Environment for Development Initiative and Resources for the Future, Washington DC, October 2009.Publications
- Peer reviewed
- EfD Discussion papers
- Discussion papers
- Policy briefs
- EfD/RFF Books
- Books
- Reports
- Research Briefs
- Other
- Theses PhD & MSc
- All Publications
EfD Newsletter
Subscribe to our Newsletter service
Join or share
Project info
Climate change in an experimental setting: The effect of stochastic future disasters and country vulnerability on cooperation.
In this project we are investigate the trade off between countries’ investments in adaptation and [cont...]
See Also
How African Agriculture Can Adapt to Climate Change? A Counterfactual Analysis from Ethiopia
We analyze and compare the impact of different adaptation strategies on crop net revenues in the [cont...]
How Should Support for Climate-Friendly Technologies Be Designed?
Stabilizing global greenhouse gas concentrations at levels to avoid significant climate risks will [cont...]
